OPen

Enhancing Engagement through Study Groups on Numerade

Role

Senior Product Designer leading the Study Groups initiative, driving research synthesis, feature strategy, interaction design, and design system expansion.

Impact

Applied behavior driven product design to prioritize lightweight interactive tools, increasing Study Groups engagement by 61% and strengthening Numerade’s long term retention strategy.

Overview

Numerade's platform thrives on providing students with valuable academic resources, yet engagement and content contributions have remained a challenge. To address this, the team proposed the feature Study Groups. This initiative was designed to offer students a collaborative environment where they could discuss academic topics, share resources, and seek support, ultimately increasing user engagement and content uploads.

What I owned

  • Led end-to-end design for Study Groups, translating high level business and learning goals into a scalable student collaboration experience.
  • Owned research synthesis, experience strategy, feature prioritization, and interaction design.
  • Partnered closely with PM and engineering to balance learning outcomes, safety, and speed to market constraints.

Objectives → Design Framing

  • Foster collaboration among students
    How might we help students ask for help and learn together without creating chaos, spam, or off topic noise?
  • Increase active user engagement
    How might we move students from passive consumption (watching answer videos) to active participation (asking, responding, sharing)?
  • Encourage content sharing
    How might we enable sharing valuable academic materials while maintaining quality, trust, and moderation at scale?

KPIs & Measurement Strategy

Engagement KPIs

Why this mattered

Study Groups aimed to shift students from passive consumption to active learning. Without participation, the feature wouldn’t succeed.

What was measured
  • Daily participation in collaborative actions (messages, replies, uploads)
  • Average time spent in Study Groups
Why was engagement chosen?

These metrics would validate whether the design lowered the barrier to contribution and encouraged active behaviors, serving as early indicators of value before long term retention data.

Retention KPIs

Why this mattered

Study Groups needed to increase platform stickiness beyond just homework help.

What was measured
  • Return rate of users who joined a Study Group
  • Frequency of repeat participation
Why was retention chosen?

Retention would show whether collaborative learning became part of users’ regular study routines rather than a novelty.

Adoption KPIs

Why this mattered

Broad adoption was required for Study Groups to meaningfully impact Numerade’s ecosystem.

What was measured
  • Percentage of active users engaging with Study Groups
  • Feature discovery and first time interaction rates
Why was adoption chosen?

Adoption would confirm the experience was intuitive, discoverable, and valuable beyond a small power user group.

Research Inputs

  • Qualitative insights from student interviews and usability testing
  • Behavioral data showing dropoffs after content consumption
  • Existing Numerade usage patterns (solo study, transactional Q&A)
  • Competitive patterns from Discord, Slack, Reddit study communities

Insight

Students want help now, not later →
Large, open groups quickly become noisy →
Fear of asking “dumb” questions is real →
Trust matters when sharing notes/exams →

Design Implication

Prioritize real time chat over asynchronous forums
Start with smaller, topic based groups
Design low friction, informal chat experiences
Strong moderation & clear group ownership needed

How Objectives translated to Features

Chat Rooms 🗨️

Why?

Real time chat directly supports peer-to-peer learning and increases engagement.

Tradeoff
  • Chose chat over threaded forums to encourage immediacy
  • Accepted higher moderation complexity in exchange for faster interaction
Design Thinking

Optimized for momentum, not perfection. Learning happens fastest when friction is low.

Collaboration Tools 🛠️

Why?

Students need lightweight ways to react, respond, and share without derailing conversations.

Tradeoff
  • Shipped a limited toolset initially instead of a full Slack style feature set
  • Focused on the most expressive, high signal interactions first
Design Thinking

Prioritized behavior shaping over feature completeness.

Moderation & Safety 🛡️

Why?

Open collaboration only works if students feel safe and content remains relevant.

Tradeoff
  • Balanced automation with human moderation tools
  • Avoided over policing early to prevent chilling participation
Design Thinking

Designed guardrails that protect users without discouraging contribution.

Content Discovery & Sharing 🔍

Why?

Shared notes, lectures, and exams extend Numerade’s learning ecosystem beyond video answers.

Tradeoff
  • Structured sharing to prevent low-quality content dumps
  • Accepted slower content growth in exchange for trust and clarity
Design Thinking

Optimized for quality signals, not raw volume.

Personalization & Group Admin ⚙️

Why?

Different study groups have different norms, subjects, and engagement levels.

Tradeoff
  • Gave admins control instead of enforcing rigid global rules
  • Increased complexity for group creators to improve long-term health
Design Thinking

Designed for scalability through ownership, not centralized control.

Key Constraints

Engineering Bandwidth →
Moderation Scalability →
Existing Numerade Architecture →
Risk of launching an unproven social feature →

Key Tradeoffs & Limitations

Scoped MVP features to validate behavior before expanding
Reused existing design system components to move faster
Designed extensible interaction patterns that could evolve
Prioritized features that changed behavior, not just UI

User Flow Mapping

Component Library & System Thinking

Study Groups required a scalable component system to support real-time collaboration. I designed reusable components for chat, reactions, threads, uploads, content previews, moderation, and system states, all built to integrate seamlessly with Numerade’s existing design system.

Rather than designing one-off screens, I focused on composable components that could scale across different group types, reduce future design and engineering overhead, and enable faster iteration without sacrificing consistency.

Tradeoffs & Constraints

To ship quickly and responsibly, I prioritized a focused set of interactions over feature completeness, accepted higher moderation complexity to enable real-time engagement, and optimized for extensibility rather than visual novelty. These decisions allowed us to validate core collaboration behaviors early while leaving room to evolve the system based on real usage.

Solution

Explore Study Groups

Search Bar

Users can search for any study group by entering keywords related to subjects, topics, or group names.

Group Previews

Each result includes key details such as the group name, description and number of active members.

Join and Request Access

Students can either join immediately or preview the group before joining.

My Groups

Joined Groups

Displays all the groups a student has actively joined, sorted by recent activity to highlight ongoing discussions.

Recommended Groups

Curated suggestions based on the student’s academic interests, past participation, and trending topics within Numerade’s platform.

Messages

Message Types

Users can send text messages, images, links, and file attachments to share valuable resources and information efficiently.

Reactions

Users can react to a message with an emoji.

Reporting

Users can react to a report inappropriate content or flag/spam for moderator review.

Threaded Conversations

To keep discussions organized, threaded replies allow students to respond directly to specific messages, ensuring key points are easily traceable.

Pinned Messages

Important messages, such as exam tips, group schedules, or key files, can be pinned for easy reference.

Creating a Study Group

Start New Group

Users can initiate group creation from the "My Groups" section or directly from the Study Groups homepage.

Invite Members

Users can invite peers by sharing a direct invite link or selecting from their network within Numerade.

Video Prototype

Outcome & Impact

Engagement Impact

Results
  • Daily collaborative actions increased by 61%
  • Average session time increased by 27%
  • The share of users who took at least one collaborative action grew from 22% to 40%
  • Reactions and threaded replies accounted for 40% of first time interactions, lowering the barrier to participation
Impact

These metrics validated that interaction-first design successfully reduced friction to contribution and encouraged sustained participation.

Retention Impact

Results
  • Study Group participants showed a 20% higher 7 day return rate compared to non-participants
  • 58% of users who engaged once returned to participate again
  • Engaged users averaged 1.8 Study Group sessions per week, indicating emerging habitual behavior
Impact

Retention data showed collaborative learning became part of students’ regular study routines rather than a novelty feature.

Adoption Impact

Results
  • 31% of weekly active users engaged with Study Groups within the first release window
  • Discovery to first interaction conversion reached 38%, supported by visible peer activity and low friction entry points
  • First time users were 1.6 times more likely to participate when groups showed recent activity
Impact

Adoption metrics confirmed the experience was intuitive, discoverable, and valuable beyond a small power user group.

If I had more time...

Ace Integration

Embed Ace into Study Groups to summarize discussions, suggest next steps, and surface relevant content at key moments of confusion.

Shared Content Repository

Evolve uploads into a searchable group library so high quality notes and resources persist beyond real time chat.

Poll, Surveys & Gamification

Introduce lo friction ways to prioritize topics, encourage participation, and reinforce helpful behaviors without incentivizing noise.

Conclusion

This project reinforced how I approach product design, to start with behavior, not features. By designing interaction first systems within real constraints, I helped shift Study Groups from passive content consumption to active collaboration, driving meaningful engagement and repeat use for Numerade.

Next Project

Bungalow Design System

Use this form to say hi!
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.